Jae Yoon

Based in Snohomish, WA

Leadership

Leading Product Experience & Insights

I lead Product Experience & Insights at Lytx. These artifacts show how I built the organization, defined roles, selected tools, and directed research.

01 / Organization

Building the organization

Earlier coverage model: Jae Yoon led central UI design. Three shared teams with six UX designers covered ten sprint teams across Fleet, ELD and Device, and Safety and Video. Technical writing and analytics supported both product lines.

Earlier design coverage

Jae Yoon · UX director

Central UI design

Technical writing + Data analytics

Supporting both product lines

Fleet, ELD & Device

Backlog Bandits

2 UX designers

4 sprint teams

Safety & Video

Retro Rockets

2 UX designers

3 sprint teams

Kanban Koalas

2 UX designers

3 sprint teams

6 UX designers covering 10 sprint teams

Inspect the full organization map
Earlier coverage model: Jae Yoon led central UI design. Three shared teams with six UX designers covered ten sprint teams across Fleet, ELD and Device, and Safety and Video. Technical writing and analytics supported both product lines.
Earlier coverage model.Design coverage view adapted from the organization map. People and shared-team names are placeholders. Open full organization map (SVG)
Combined organization headcount
3 to 15+
Designers hired over my tenure
15+ Cumulative hiring

My contribution. I designed the coverage model, hired designers, and established the Bangalore design team in person.

Result. Design hiring and a reorganization bringing in analytics and technical writing expanded the organization across the US, India, and Israel.

Colleagues gathered around a table at a team dinner.
Time together outside the daily work.
Coverage, hiring, and shared practice

Earlier coverage

Six UX designers in three shared teams supported 10 sprint teams across two product lines. UI design sat centrally. Technical writing and analytics supported both lines.

This map documents an earlier structure; it is not a current headcount chart.

Hiring and onboarding

I used a shared scorecard to assess product judgment. Onboarding guides introduced responsibilities and processes.

Shared practice

The handbook documented ownership and role expectations. Recorded walkthroughs supported review across time zones.

Handbook example

02 / Role proposal

Combining PM and UX

Proposed role

Product Experience Lead

PM product judgment + UX discovery and design

01 Product judgment
Frame the problem and risks. Prioritize value and scope. Align stakeholders for beta and general release.
02 Experience craft
Lead discovery and research. Design workflows and interactions. Verify usability.
03 AI-first building
Build functional prototypes. Gather evidence and context. Derive requirements, specifications, tests, and stories.
Shared working materialPrototype + supporting specifications

Review scope, tradeoffs, sequencing, and acceptance together.

Engineering ownsTechnical choices, build, and verification

Engineering surfaces constraints, risks, and possibilities.

Adapted from PX Lead, slides 1 and 3. Open original role graphic (PNG)

My contribution. I defined the combined role and proposed a staged transition while retaining design coverage for active product work.

Documented status. Role definition and transition proposal. Adoption and rollout results are not established by these materials.

How the proposed operating loop works
  1. Joint

    Sense change

    Customer learning, requirements, and technical discoveries.

  2. Joint

    Work through options

    Value, feasibility, and tradeoffs.

  3. Lead-driven

    Update shared sources

    The prototype shows behavior; specifications capture what it cannot show.

  4. Joint

    Build and verify

    Engineering checks technical quality. The PX Lead checks UX.

  5. Lead-driven

    Derive artifacts

    Requirements, delivery stories, acceptance criteria, and documentation.

  6. Joint

    Learn and pivot

    Use rapid feedback to adjust scope and restart the loop.

Adapted from PX Lead, slide 3. New information restarts the cycle; updating sources can return the partners to tradeoff discussions.
Related prototyping practice

I established near-working software as the team’s prototyping standard. Agentic Fleet Tracking uses a simulated middle and back end. Driver AI Assist is another prototype from this practice.

03 / Vendor selection

Selecting Pendo

Historical assessment · 2025

Pendo selectedApproval secured

Historical comparison of Amplitude, Pendo, and WalkMe from the 2025 evaluation
CriterionAmplitudePendo SelectedWalkMe
Guide authoringSimple editor; fewer rich-content optionsIntuitive visual editor; rich templatesPowerful logic; more technical expertise
AnalyticsDeep funnels, cohorts, and custom analysisAccessible reporting; less custom depthBasic reports and preset dashboards
Event setupManual events; emerging auto-captureRetroactive tagging; little ongoing engineering after setupAuto-capture needed further assessment
SurveysNewer NPS and microsurveysMature NPS, polls, and open textAdvanced forms; more training
In-app helpNo native resource centerBuilt-in articles, videos, and guidesCustom help widgets; more governance
Condensed from BakeOff, slides 4, 6, and 8. Findings reflect the evaluation at that time.

My contribution. I evaluated the vendors through demos and capability comparisons, recommended Pendo, and negotiated terms and rates.

Result. I secured approval for Pendo. The recommendation favored its balance of accessible analytics and in-app guidance for teams beyond Engineering.

Assessment scope and source excerpts

Pendo still required initial implementation. The source distinguishes ongoing self-service from initial setup; WalkMe’s auto-capture needed further assessment.

These slides document the historical assessment. Approval does not establish migration completion or realized savings.

04 / Research practice

Establishing research practice

04 / Discuss

Pain points

Difficult to coach when the driver believes that they didn’t do anything wrong.

Not given a comprehensive view of the driver’s performance. No opportunity to recognize what the driver has done right.

Question

How can we help coaches make the biggest impact with this coaching conversation?

Selected cells adapted from the coaching journey, December 2022. Wording retained with punctuation normalized.

Coaching journey

What makes a coaching conversation difficult?

The map places pain points and research questions alongside the workflow.

Open full coaching journey (PNG)
View the original cells
Original Discuss phase pain points and questions, including the lack of a comprehensive performance view and positive recognition.
Fleet operations persona role overview: plan weekly goals with supervisors; run reports to find behavior, idling and speeding trends; address safety risks; verify work and manage payroll; track the fleet; monitor vehicle and equipment conditions.
Focused crop from the fleet operations manager persona.

Fleet operations persona

A role that extends beyond the interface

The role overview captures operational responsibilities alongside product tasks.

Open full fleet operations persona (PNG)
Device shipment journey excerpt: select a group for installation, select date and time, verify the shipping address, and create install bundles.
Focused crop of Device Shipment from the installation journey, March 2023.

Installation journey

Mapping the work around installation

The shipment phase makes scheduling and address verification visible before installation begins. The full map includes open questions and UI explorations.

Open full installation journey (PDF)

My contribution. I organized field research and usability testing and directed the team’s persona and journey mapping. These are team artifacts; the available records do not identify every individual author.

Documented result. The maps captured customer roles, workflows, and open questions. A shared repository kept findings available to product teams.

View the full UX artifact collection
Research context and supporting evidence

The collection comes from the team’s 2022–2023 customer research. These excerpts document the research practice; they do not establish a direct connection to later product decisions.

Related platform workNext-generation Lytx UI →